Yesterday I had the privilege of teaching Advanced Legal Aspects of Code Enforcement for Property Maintenance Inspectors for the Missouri Association of Code Enforcement at Lake of the Ozarks, MO. Today I read the headlines about the 8 children killed in a fire in a building in Chicago with code violations. The owner was already in court for this building that the Chicago Sun-Times said was without working smoke detectors. I remember telling the inspectors yesterday that they save lives by doing their jobs and that rental inspection programs are a key part of enforcement. It is just so sad that this loss of life happens when these tragedies can be prevented yet some landlords resist spending the money necessary to ensure their buildings are safe. In Illinois we have tried to get legislation passed so that non-home rule communities can license landlords but the proposed bills always die because of opposition by those who do not care enough about the safety of the public. What a waste of young lives.
Categories: Building Codes, Code Enforcement, Court cases, Fire Prevention, Politics, Politics and building codes, property maintenance, rental inspections, training Tags: children, code enforcement, deaths, fire code, property maintenance
Having prosecuted many owner/landlords, I have heard lots of excuses for the violations on their properties but they are all very similar. I started pondering this after reading an article about an owner/landlord in West Virginia who complained he was being harassed and singled out over properties he owned. These “defenses” fall into the following categories:
- The inspectors don’t know what they’re doing and the (fill in the blank) is perfectly fine.
- The inspectors are out to get me because of (choose one – politics, they don’t like me, I am a ______ and I’m being discriminated against).
- I’m being harassed.
- The inspectors aren’t going after other people who commit violations (sometimes illustrated with photos).
- I’ve put $$$ into the properties and the inspectors aren’t giving me time to fix things or I don’t have the money to fix the properties.
- The city wants to put something else where my property is and is trying to drive me out.
- The tenants destroy my property.
Some of these may be legitimate reasons but often not legal defenses. My response to these types of arguments are:
- Did you appeal the inspectors decision to a higher authority?
- Did you report the harassment to the police?
- There is no such crime as “harassment”.
- If the inspectors have been smart and notified other violators at the same time as a troublesome owner, I point out that he/she is the only one who didn’t comply after notification.
- Please give the photos to the inspectors so they can follow up on enforcement against the offender (usually met with, “I don’t want to get anyone in trouble.”
- If he/she can’t afford to keep the property up, maybe it’s time to consider other options.
- What proof does he/she have of the city trying to have something else built on the property.
- Perhaps screening tenants would be a good way of saving money on repairs in the future.
- Do you agree there are violations on the property in addition to the reasons you think you’re being harassed?
Rarely does anything legitimate come up in these conversations. Do any of my readers have other great excuses? I will publish the best ones.